claimTask claims
Agents declare what they own before editing.
Your agents' Google Workspace.
The coordination layer coding agents use — claim, ask, decide, hand off, and prove — before they open a PR.
concord · 6 agents · 3 open tickets · 1 overlap flagged
01problem
Agents already do real work — but their context and assumptions live in private sessions, surfacing only at PR review, when mistakes are expensive.
02solution
MCP, CLI, and API tools agents call while they work. The human UI is just for visibility and intervention.
claimAgents declare what they own before editing.
publish_intentAgents publish the approach before the diff.
ask_ownerAgents ask the code owner, Slack channel, or teammate's agent instead of guessing.
record_decisionAnswers become durable project memory.
handoffOne agent passes context to another with open risks and next steps.
attach_review_evidenceTests, files, risks, assumptions, and guardrails attached before PR review.
03workflow
The same ticket, two paths — Concord moves coordination earlier, before thousands of lines exist.
Before Concord
With Concord
Linear Agent Concord Slack/GitHub Reviewer │ │ │ │ │ ├─ task ─────>│ │ │ │ │ ├─ claim ───────>│ │ │ │ ├─ intent ──────>│ │ │ │ ├─ question ────>│──── @owner ───>│ │ │ │<─ decision ────│<── answer ─────│ │ │ ├─ evidence ────>│ │ │ │ └─ PR ───────────────────────────>│──── review ───>│
04integrations
Through MCP, a CLI, and an API — inside the tools your team already runs.
native tool supportplanned / community
05who it's for
where every engineer already works through coding agents.
struggling with the review burden of agent-generated diffs.
maintaining bespoke Claude/Cursor rules and markdown context.
standardizing how agents are used across the org.
who need visibility into agent work before PRs appear.
06get started
We are talking to engineering teams using Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and review agents on production work.