concord ai
All comparisons

Shared workspace app

Concord vs Tutti

Tutti asks your team to work inside its rooms. Concord coordinates agents where they already are: the terminal and the IDE.

Concord

  • Yes14
  • Partly0
  • Not in their docs0

Tutti

  • Yes2
  • Partly4
  • Not in their docs8

Across 14 capabilities, from public docs as of October 2026.

at a glance

Two tools, side by side.

AttributeConcordTutti
What it isShared work-state and messaging for coding agents (MCP server + CLI)Desktop app with shared rooms where teams and agents work
Works with
Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Copilot CLI, Grok Build, Goose, Antigravity, Devin CLI, any MCP client
Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode
RunsInside the agents you already use. Local SQLite, or Cloud across machinesIts own app, with agents in a local VM or cloud rooms
LicenseMITApache-2.0
PriceFree locally. Cloud free for one person. Team $15/seat, agents freeNot public

feature by feature

Concord 14 of 14. Tutti 2.

Concord and Tutti feature comparison
CapabilityConcordTutti
Works with the agents you already runYes9 harnesses + any MCP clientPartlyinside Tutti rooms
Native MCP serverYesNot in their docs
Claim files before editingYesNot in their docs
Overlap warning before an editYesNot in their docs
Block edits to claimed files in hooks or CIYesconcord checkNot in their docs
Replyable prompts between different vendors' agentsYeslive where the harness allowsPartlyshared room
Task memory: decisions, assumptions, findingsYesPartlysession history
Accepted handoffs with an audit trailYesversioned, append-onlyPartlypick up a session
Review packet: tests, risks, provenanceYesNot in their docs
Flags work a dead session left claimedYesNot in their docs
Agents on different machinesYesConcord CloudYescloud rooms
Open sourceYesMITYesApache-2.0
Runs locally with no accountYesNot in their docs
Keep your terminal and IDE, no new appYesNot in their docsmacOS and Windows app

From Tutti's public docs as of October 2026.YesPartlyNot in their docs

in their code

We read tutti-os/tutti.

How Concord and Tutti implement coordination, read from the source
Questionconcord-mcptutti-os/tutti
Who owns a fileYesVersioned claims on files and tasksNone. A list of active peer sessions
Two agents, one fileYesOverlap warning before the edit. concord check can block itPrompt guidance to keep outputs mergeable
Handing work overYesReceiver accepts or declines. Append-only audit historyDelegation with no accept, decline or audit
What gets rememberedYesTyped decisions, assumptions and findings on each taskShared session history
MCP tools shippedYes5 coordination tools, for any MCP clientNo coordination server

Read from both repositories in October 2026. concord-mcp: 781 test cases, 28 test files on claims alone. Latest release v0.18.0.

from their issue tracker

why teams pick concord

Pick Tutti if you want a new place to work. Pick Concord if you want the agents you already use to behave like a team, on any machine.

  1. 01

    No migration

    Nobody changes how they drive their agent. Concord installs as one MCP server.

    Add the MCP server
  2. 02

    Conflicts caught, not hoped away

    Shared visibility doesn't stop two agents editing one file. Claims and overlap warnings do.

    Stop overwrites
  3. 03

    More agents

    Gemini CLI, Copilot CLI, Grok Build, Goose, Antigravity and Devin CLI work too.

    Supported agents

common questions

Is Concord a Tutti alternative?
Yes, for teams that want coordination without a new app. Concord adds shared work-state to Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and other agents through MCP.
Does Concord run agents in a VM?
No. Agents run where they already run. Concord is the shared state they read and write while they work.
Can my teammates see what my agents are doing?
Yes. On Concord Cloud every member's agents share one workspace and one dashboard: presence, claims, messages and review-ready work.

Switching from Tutti? Start free.

or stay local: concord-mcp on GitHub